Partnership with a purpose
GOB partnerships should begin with a defined member or programme need and identify what each side will contribute. A relationship that exists only as an announcement should not be treated as strategic value.
These standards help distinguish a credible member-value relationship from a promotional arrangement that creates more risk than benefit.
Use this page as practical guidance and consult formal policy pages when they apply.
GOB can work with companies, universities, foundations, service providers, experts, institutions and other organizations when the relationship creates practical value and fits the project’s institutional standards.
GOB can provide a structured route to engage eligible Moroccan and African organizations, diaspora networks and thematic communities. Depending on the relationship, this can support training, knowledge exchange, digital access, member benefits, research or programme collaboration.
Partners should have an identifiable institutional or legal basis, a credible reason to engage the network, responsible conduct and willingness to describe the relationship accurately. Review can be proportionate to the scale and risk of the proposed cooperation.
Models can include member benefit partnerships, technology and digital support, university and knowledge collaboration, programme partnerships, pro bono expertise, research, event cooperation or broader institutional relationships.
A company partnership does not mean GOB endorses every product or service of that company. Any member offer should explain material pricing, eligibility, territory, duration, renewal and redemption conditions clearly enough for users to make an informed decision.
Use of GOB or MYCDIC names, logos, quotes or institutional relationships requires authorization. A partner must not imply governmental endorsement, diplomatic status or a broader relationship than the agreed scope supports.
GOB can review, suspend or end an arrangement when terms change materially, delivery is weak, serious complaints arise, reputational risk increases or the partnership no longer provides meaningful value to the intended beneficiaries.
If the relationship cannot be described in one clear paragraph without exaggeration, it is not ready to be promoted as an official partnership.
These notes explain how the principles on this page should translate into everyday decisions and responsible participation in the GOB network.
A simple one-session expert contribution does not require the same process as a large commercial or strategic relationship. Review should scale with access, brand exposure, data, financial value and institutional risk.
A partnership does not automatically give an external organization the right to contact members, receive application data or use participant information for unrelated promotion. Any data use should have a defined purpose and appropriate safeguards.
Logos and institutional wording should reflect the actual relationship. GOB can approve specific materials or uses without granting unrestricted permission to present the project or MYCDIC as endorsing everything a partner does.
Material partnerships benefit from a clear duration, responsible contact, review point and exit route so the relationship can change when delivery, risk or strategic relevance changes.
This section adds operational context so the page explains not only what the subject is, but how it connects to membership, programmes, continental coordination, partnerships and institutional trust.
GOB partnerships should begin with a defined member or programme need and identify what each side will contribute. A relationship that exists only as an announcement should not be treated as strategic value.
Before public promotion, the project should understand partner identity, proposed contribution, material terms and relevant risks.
Commercial benefits should state real eligibility, duration and exclusions. A permanent discount percentage should not be advertised without an active agreement supporting it.
Relationships should be reviewed by usefulness, programme delivery, member uptake and continued institutional fit.
Public information should remain accurate to current appointments, approved members, active programmes and signed agreements. Future ambition is presented as direction, not completed impact.
A partnership should create a defined form of value and a clear allocation of responsibility. These standards are intended to reduce ceremonial agreements, unclear benefit claims and the reputational risk that can arise when a logo is treated as evidence of a functioning relationship.
Before publication, the proposed relationship should identify the parties, the intended area of cooperation and a responsible contact on each side. Where a partner is a company, university, foundation or network, GOB should be able to verify that the person negotiating the relationship has an appropriate connection to that institution.
If a partnership is presented as providing a member benefit, the eligible users, material conditions and current availability should be documented. GOB should not promote a permanent discount, grant, internship, certificate or other advantage unless the underlying arrangement actually supports that claim.
Use of names, logos, photographs and public statements should follow the approved cooperation terms. A partner should not imply endorsement by MYCDIC, GOB or member organizations beyond what has been agreed. Likewise, GOB should not imply that a partner supports every activity of the network.
Partnerships should be reviewable when conditions change. Misrepresentation, safeguarding concerns, non-delivery, reputational risk, unlawful activity or material conflict with project standards can justify suspension of public references or termination of the relationship, subject to the applicable agreement and review process.
This section describes the operating framework of GOB. Specific programmes, offers, appointments and partnerships remain subject to their published terms and current institutional status.