Member Benefit
Preferential offers, discounts, credits, donated access or services.
GOB structures partnerships according to what each partner can responsibly contribute and what beneficiary organizations can practically use.

Preferential offers, discounts, credits, donated access or services.
Co-designed learning, events, exchanges or thematic initiatives.
Research, expertise, mentorship, publications or technical guidance.
Software access, cloud resources, digital tools or implementation support.
Longer-term cooperation around shared strategic priorities.
Calls, challenges, placements or programmes opened to eligible GOB organizations.
Member benefits, technology, knowledge, programme, institutional and pro bono relationships should not all be labelled the same way.
GOB can provide a structured route to engage eligible Moroccan and African organizations, diaspora networks and thematic communities. Depending on the relationship, this can support training, knowledge exchange, digital access, member benefits, research or programme collaboration.
Partners should have an identifiable institutional or legal basis, a credible reason to engage the network, responsible conduct and willingness to describe the relationship accurately. Review can be proportionate to the scale and risk of the proposed cooperation.
Models can include member benefit partnerships, technology and digital support, university and knowledge collaboration, programme partnerships, pro bono expertise, research, event cooperation or broader institutional relationships.
A company partnership does not mean GOB endorses every product or service of that company. Any member offer should explain material pricing, eligibility, territory, duration, renewal and redemption conditions clearly enough for users to make an informed decision.
Use of GOB or MYCDIC names, logos, quotes or institutional relationships requires authorization. A partner must not imply governmental endorsement, diplomatic status or a broader relationship than the agreed scope supports.
GOB can review, suspend or end an arrangement when terms change materially, delivery is weak, serious complaints arise, reputational risk increases or the partnership no longer provides meaningful value to the intended beneficiaries.
If the relationship cannot be described in one clear paragraph without exaggeration, it is not ready to be promoted as an official partnership.
These notes explain how the principles on this page should translate into everyday decisions and responsible participation in the GOB network.
A simple one-session expert contribution does not require the same process as a large commercial or strategic relationship. Review should scale with access, brand exposure, data, financial value and institutional risk.
A partnership does not automatically give an external organization the right to contact members, receive application data or use participant information for unrelated promotion. Any data use should have a defined purpose and appropriate safeguards.
Logos and institutional wording should reflect the actual relationship. GOB can approve specific materials or uses without granting unrestricted permission to present the project or MYCDIC as endorsing everything a partner does.
Material partnerships benefit from a clear duration, responsible contact, review point and exit route so the relationship can change when delivery, risk or strategic relevance changes.
This section adds operational context so the page explains not only what the subject is, but how it connects to membership, programmes, continental coordination, partnerships and institutional trust.
GOB partnerships should begin with a defined member or programme need and identify what each side will contribute. A relationship that exists only as an announcement should not be treated as strategic value.
Before public promotion, the project should understand partner identity, proposed contribution, material terms and relevant risks.
Commercial benefits should state real eligibility, duration and exclusions. A permanent discount percentage should not be advertised without an active agreement supporting it.
Relationships should be reviewed by usefulness, programme delivery, member uptake and continued institutional fit.
Public information should remain accurate to current appointments, approved members, active programmes and signed agreements. Future ambition is presented as direction, not completed impact.
GOB should not force every institution into the same memorandum or sponsorship format. The appropriate structure depends on what the counterpart can contribute and what the network genuinely needs.
Public institutions, established networks and civil-society bodies may cooperate around referrals, events, capacity-building, information exchange or specific thematic initiatives. The relationship should identify what each party is responsible for and avoid implying powers that neither side has granted.
Companies and service providers may offer tools, credits, preferential pricing, training or technical support. These arrangements require especially clear eligibility terms because an offer may vary by country, organization type, number of users or provider policy.
Universities, schools, research centres and expert institutions can contribute speakers, knowledge products, training access, research collaboration or student engagement. Academic independence and the institution’s own approval rules should remain respected.
Some relationships may exist only for one project, call, cohort or event. A limited cooperation can be preferable to a broad partnership statement when the parties want to test delivery first. Successful activity can later justify a wider framework.
This section describes the operating framework of GOB. Specific programmes, offers, appointments and partnerships remain subject to their published terms and current institutional status.